pan.tf
Compare
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) vs LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024)

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Lenovo LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024)

What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (8) and where LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024) wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Acer · 2024Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)

6.6Score

8 advantages≈ $2,150

Higher score

Lenovo · 2024LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024)

6.4Score

6 advantages

2.3Memory & storage4.9

9.3Battery & portability5.8

8.4Features & cooling5.1

Dimensions

Size comparison

Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024)

	Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)	LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024)	Difference
Depth	250 mm	258.7 mm	−8.7 mm
Width	356 mm	359.9 mm	−3.9 mm
Thickness	21 mm	23.9 mm	−2.9 mm
Weight	2.1 kg	2.4 kg	−0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) better than LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024)?

CPU cores14 vs 62.3×
Battery capacity76 Wh vs 60 Wh+27%
Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024): No
Weight2.1 kg vs 2.38 kg+13%
RAM (base)16 GB vs 8 GB2×
SD card readerYes · LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024): No
Thickness21 mm vs 23.9 mm+14%
Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%

Why is LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)?

RAM (up to)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
SSD (up to)512 GB vs 2,048 GB4×
Resolution classHD (768p/900p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,072+20%
Max CPU clock4.5 GHz vs 5 GHz+11%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)≈ $2,1506.6	Lenovo LOQ 15AHP9 RTX 4060 (2024)6.4
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	—	115 W
Video memory	6 GB	8 GB
Video memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
GPU shader cores	2,560	3,072
GPU compute (FP32)	—	14.6 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	—	11,263
Processor
Processor	Core Ultra 5 125H	Ryzen 5 8645HS
CPU maker	Intel	AMD
CPU cores	14	6
CPU threads	—	12
Max CPU clock	4.5 GHz	5 GHz
Processor options	—	Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS
Geekbench 6 multi-core	—	11,603
Geekbench 6 single-core	—	2,802
Cinebench 2024 multi-core	—	764
Display
Screen size	16″	15.6″
Resolution	1600 × 900	1920 × 1080
Resolution class	HD (768p/900p)	Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate	—	144 Hz
Panel type	—	IPS
Brightness	—	300 nits
sRGB coverage	—	100%
Pixel density	—	141 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:9
G-Sync / FreeSync	—	Yes
Advanced Optimus	—	Yes
MUX switch	—	Yes
HDR	—	No
Touchscreen	—	No
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	16 GB	32 GB
RAM (base)	16 GB	8 GB
RAM type	DDR5	DDR5
RAM speed	—	5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM	—	32 GB
RAM slots	—	2
Upgradable RAM	—	Yes
SSD (up to)	512 GB	2,048 GB
SSD (base)	512 GB	512 GB
M.2 SSD slots	—	2
SSD interface	—	PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity	76 Wh	60 Wh
Power adapter	230 W	230 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	—	Yes
Design & cooling
Weight	2.1 kg	2.38 kg
Thickness	21 mm	23.9 mm
Width	356 mm	359.9 mm
Depth	250 mm	258.7 mm
Body material	—	Plastic
Colours	—	Gray
Cooling fans	—	2
Vapor chamber cooling	—	No
Liquid metal (CPU)	—	No
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4	Thunderbolt 4	—
Thunderbolt or USB4	Yes	No
USB-C ports	—	1
USB-A ports	—	3
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	Yes	No
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	Yes	No
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.2
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	—	Yes
Numeric keypad	—	Yes
Key travel	—	1.5 mm
Webcam	1,080p	1,080p
IR camera (face login)	—	No
Fingerprint reader	—	No
Audio
Speakers	2 speakers	2.0
Dolby Atmos	—	No