pan.tf
Compare
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) vs TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)

What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (3) and where TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Acer · 2024Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)

6.6Score

3 advantages≈ $2,150

Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)

Asus · 2025TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)

7.5Score

6 advantages≈ $1,850

Higher score

2.3Memory & storage3.1

9.3Battery & portability8.4

8.4Features & cooling7.6

Dimensions

Size comparison

Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)

	Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)	TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)	Difference
Depth	250 mm	269 mm	−19 mm
Width	356 mm	354 mm	+2 mm
Thickness	21 mm	27 mm	−6 mm
Weight	2.1 kg	2.2 kg	−0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)?

Weight2.1 kg vs 2.2 kg+5%
Thickness21 mm vs 27 mm+29%
SD card readerYes · TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025): No

Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)?

Resolution classHD (768p/900p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,328+30%
CPU cores14 vs 16+14%
Max CPU clock4.5 GHz vs 5.2 GHz+16%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)≈ $2,1506.6	Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF608 RTX 5060 (2025)≈ $1,8507.5
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop	GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	—	115 W
Video memory	6 GB	8 GB
Video memory type	GDDR6	GDDR7
GPU shader cores	2,560	3,328
GPU compute (FP32)	—	18.4 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	—	12,717
Processor
Processor	Core Ultra 5 125H	Core i7-14650HX
CPU maker	Intel	Intel
CPU cores	14	16
Max CPU clock	4.5 GHz	5.2 GHz
Processor options	—	Core i5-13450HX, Core i5-14450HX, Core 5 210H, Core i7-13620H, Core i7-13650HX, Core i7-14650HX, Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core i9-13980HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
Display
Screen size	16″	16″
Resolution	1600 × 900	1920 × 1200
Resolution class	HD (768p/900p)	Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate	—	165 Hz
Panel type	—	IPS
Brightness	—	300 nits
sRGB coverage	—	100%
Pixel density	—	142 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:10
G-Sync / FreeSync	—	Yes
Advanced Optimus	—	No
MUX switch	—	Yes
HDR	—	No
Touchscreen	—	No
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	16 GB	16 GB
RAM (base)	16 GB	16 GB
RAM type	DDR5	DDR5
RAM speed	—	5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM	—	64 GB
RAM slots	—	2
Upgradable RAM	—	Yes
SSD (up to)	512 GB	512 GB
SSD (base)	512 GB	512 GB
M.2 SSD slots	—	2
SSD interface	—	PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity	76 Wh	90 Wh
Power adapter	230 W	280 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	—	Yes
USB-C charging power	—	100 W
Design & cooling
Weight	2.1 kg	2.2 kg
Thickness	21 mm	27 mm
Width	356 mm	354 mm
Depth	250 mm	269 mm
Body material	—	Aluminium, Plastic
Colours	—	Black
Cooling fans	—	2
Vapor chamber cooling	—	No
Liquid metal (CPU)	—	No
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4	Thunderbolt 4	Thunderbolt 4
Thunderbolt or USB4	Yes	Yes
USB-C ports	—	2
USB-A ports	—	3
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	Yes	No
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	Yes	No
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	—	Yes
Numeric keypad	—	Yes
Key travel	—	1.7 mm
Webcam	1,080p	1,080p
IR camera (face login)	—	Yes
Fingerprint reader	—	No
Audio
Speakers	2 speakers	2 speakers
Dolby Atmos	—	Yes