pan.tf
Compare
Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) vs Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4060 (2024)

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) vs MSI Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4060 (2024)

What Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) does better (6) and where Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4060 (2024) wins (9) — every spec side by side.

Acer · 2024Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)

6.6Score

6 advantages≈ $2,150

Higher score

MSI · 2024Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4060 (2024)

6.5Score

9 advantages

2.3Memory & storage9.3

9.3Battery & portability6.5

8.4Features & cooling5.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4060 (2024)

	Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)	Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4060 (2024)	Difference
Depth	250 mm	250.3 mm	−0.3 mm
Width	356 mm	359.4 mm	−3.4 mm
Thickness	21 mm	22.9 mm	−1.9 mm
Weight	2.1 kg	2 kg	+0.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024) better than Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4060 (2024)?

Battery capacity76 Wh vs 53 Wh+43%
Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4060 (2024): No
SD card readerYes · Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4060 (2024): No
Thickness21 mm vs 22.9 mm+9%
Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
Screen size16″ vs 15.6″+3%

Why is Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4060 (2024) better than Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)?

RAM (up to)16 GB vs 96 GB6×
SSD (up to)512 GB vs 2,048 GB4×
Resolution classHD (768p/900p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Weight2.1 kg vs 1.98 kg+6%
Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,072+20%
CPU cores14 vs 16+14%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Max CPU clock4.5 GHz vs 4.8 GHz+7%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51 RTX 4050 (2024)≈ $2,1506.6	MSI Cyborg 15 AI RTX 4060 (2024)6.5
Graphics
Graphics card	GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop	GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
GPU maker	NVIDIA	NVIDIA
GPU power (TGP)	—	45 W
Video memory	6 GB	8 GB
Video memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
GPU shader cores	2,560	3,072
GPU compute (FP32)	—	9.8 TFLOPS
3DMark Steel Nomad Light	—	8,244
Processor
Processor	Core Ultra 5 125H	Core Ultra 7 155H
CPU maker	Intel	Intel
CPU cores	14	16
CPU threads	—	22
Max CPU clock	4.5 GHz	4.8 GHz
Processor options	—	Core Ultra 7 155H
Geekbench 6 multi-core	—	12,885
Geekbench 6 single-core	—	2,507
Cinebench 2024 multi-core	—	1,002
Display
Screen size	16″	15.6″
Resolution	1600 × 900	1920 × 1080
Resolution class	HD (768p/900p)	Full HD (1080p/1200p)
Refresh rate	—	144 Hz
Panel type	—	IPS
Pixel density	—	141 ppi
Aspect ratio	16:10	16:9
G-Sync / FreeSync	—	No
Advanced Optimus	—	Yes
MUX switch	—	Yes
HDR	—	No
Touchscreen	—	No
Memory & storage
RAM (up to)	16 GB	96 GB
RAM (base)	16 GB	16 GB
RAM type	DDR5	DDR5
RAM speed	—	5,600 MHz
Max. supported RAM	—	96 GB
RAM slots	—	2
Upgradable RAM	—	Yes
SSD (up to)	512 GB	2,048 GB
SSD (base)	512 GB	512 GB
M.2 SSD slots	—	2
SSD interface	—	PCIe 4.0 x4
Battery & power
Battery capacity	76 Wh	53 Wh
Power adapter	230 W	120 W
USB-C charging (Power Delivery)	—	No
Design & cooling
Weight	2.1 kg	1.98 kg
Thickness	21 mm	22.9 mm
Width	356 mm	359.4 mm
Depth	250 mm	250.3 mm
Body material	—	Plastic
Colours	—	Black
Cooling fans	—	1
Vapor chamber cooling	—	No
Liquid metal (CPU)	—	No
Ports & wireless
Thunderbolt / USB4	Thunderbolt 4	—
Thunderbolt or USB4	Yes	No
USB-C ports	—	1
USB-A ports	—	2
HDMI	HDMI 2.1	HDMI 2.1
HDMI 2.1	Yes	Yes
(Mini) DisplayPort	Yes	No
Ethernet port	Yes	Yes
SD card reader	Yes	No
3.5 mm audio jack	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
Keyboard & camera
Backlit keyboard	—	Yes
Numeric keypad	—	Yes
Webcam	1,080p	720p
IR camera (face login)	—	No
Fingerprint reader	—	No
Audio
Speakers	2 speakers	2.0
Dolby Atmos	—	No