Acer Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)
What Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023) does better (20) and where ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Graphics8.1
9.5Overall performance8.3
9.8Display9.3
8.6Memory & storage8.6
7.9Battery & portability9.3
9.2Features & cooling9.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023) | ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 280 mm | 246 mm | +34 mm |
| Width | 380.4 mm | 355 mm | +25.4 mm |
| Thickness | 21.9 mm | 22.9 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)45.2 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS2.1×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light24,735 vs 13,883+78%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core1,809 vs 7542.4×
- GPU shader cores9,728 vs 4,6082.1×
- GPU power (TGP)175 W vs 140 W+25%
- Video memory16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Panel typeMini-LED vs IPS
- Brightness1,000 nits vs 500 nits2×
- Battery capacity100 Wh vs 90 Wh+11%
- CPU cores24 vs 14+71%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core17,604 vs 15,617+13%
- Refresh rate250 Hz vs 240 Hz+4%
Why is ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)?
- Weight3 kg vs 2.3 kg+30%
- IR camera (face login)No · Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023): Yes
- Pixel density178 ppi vs 189 ppi+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 175 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 9,728 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 45.2 TFLOPS | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 24,735 | 13,883 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i9-13900HX | Core i9-13900H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 14 |
| CPU threads | 32 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i9-13900HX | Core i9-13900H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 17,604 | 15,617 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,036 | 2,821 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,809 | 754 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 17″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 250 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | IPS |
| Brightness | 1,000 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 178 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 100 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 21.9 mm | 22.9 mm |
| Width | 380.4 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 280 mm | 246 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 3 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | Yes | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 57.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | Yes | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)9.69.4vs
Acer Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)vsLenovo Legion 9i Gen 8 RTX 4090 (2023)9.69.6vs
Acer Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)vsRazer Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.69.6vs
Acer Predator Triton 17 X RTX 4090 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix SCAR 16 RTX 4090 (2023)9.69.6
vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 RTX 4080 (2023)9.49.4vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 RTX 4070 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7i Gen 8 Intel RTX 4090 (2023)9.49.5