Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Gigabyte A18 Pro RTX 5080 (2026)
What Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (16) and where A18 Pro RTX 5080 (2026) wins (9) — every spec side by side.
5.4Score
Higher score 16 advantages≈ $3,900
vs
5.0Graphics5.2
5.1Overall performance3.0
4.9Display4.2
4.2Memory & storage5.1
2.8Battery & portability5.8
4.8Features & cooling2.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)A18 Pro RTX 5080 (2026)
| Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | A18 Pro RTX 5080 (2026) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 312 mm | 293.4 mm | +18.6 mm |
| Width | 404 mm | 403.7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 29 mm | 25 mm | +4 mm |
| Weight | 3.4 kg | 2.9 kg | +0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than A18 Pro RTX 5080 (2026)?
- CPU cores24 vs 83×
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 115 W+22%
- Panel typeMini-LED vs IPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · A18 Pro RTX 5080 (2026): No
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 76 Wh+18%
- RAM (base)64 GB vs 16 GB4×
- SSD (base)2,000 GB vs 512 GB3.9×
- GPU compute (FP32)31.2 TFLOPS vs 30 TFLOPS+4%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · A18 Pro RTX 5080 (2026): No
- Advanced OptimusYes · A18 Pro RTX 5080 (2026): No
- USB-C charging (Power Delivery)Yes · A18 Pro RTX 5080 (2026): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · A18 Pro RTX 5080 (2026): No
Why is A18 Pro RTX 5080 (2026) better than Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- Weight3.4 kg vs 2.9 kg+17%
- Video memory12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Brightness300 nits vs 400 nits+33%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 7,680+30%
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- Thickness29 mm vs 25 mm+16%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Pixel density126 ppi vs 168 ppi+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 31.2 TFLOPS | 30 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 20,254 | 20,612 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core 5 210H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 8 |
| CPU threads | — | 12 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core 5 210H, Core 7 240H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | — | 9,306 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | — | 2,528 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | — | 596 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 97% |
| Pixel density | 126 ppi | 168 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 76 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | 240 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | No |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3.4 kg | 2.9 kg |
| Thickness | 29 mm | 25 mm |
| Width | 404 mm | 403.7 mm |
| Depth | 312 mm | 293.4 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | — | 57.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 1 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5070 (2025)5.45.6vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Key 18 Pro RTX 5070 Ti (2025)5.45.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5050 (2025)5.45.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMSI Crosshair 18 HX AI RTX 5060 (2025)5.45.3vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G814 RTX 4060 (2024)5.45.0