- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (4) and where Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025) wins (3) — every spec side by side.
5.4Score
Higher score 4 advantages≈ $3,900
vs
4.2Memory & storage2.4
Why is Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025): No
- RAM (base)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
- Video memory12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 7,680+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | — |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 31.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 20,254 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 18″ | 18″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — |
| Panel type | Mini-LED | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 126 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 2,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 3.4 kg | — |
| Thickness | 29 mm | — |
| Width | 404 mm | — |
| Depth | 312 mm | — |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2 speakers | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5070 (2025)5.45.6vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Key 18 Pro RTX 5070 Ti (2025)5.45.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMSI Crosshair 18 HX AI RTX 5060 (2025)5.45.3vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G815 RTX 5050 (2025)5.45.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 18 AI PHN18-72 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix G18 G814 RTX 4060 (2024)5.45.0
vs
MSI Raider 18 Max HX A2W RTX 5070 Ti (2026)vsMedion Erazer Beast 18 X1 RTX 5080 (2025)