Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) vs Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) does better (9) and where Yoga Pro 9 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025) wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.7Graphics8.0
7.6Overall performance8.9
9.2Display8.4
8.4Memory & storage6.9
3.8Battery & portability6.8
6.8Features & cooling9.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)Yoga Pro 9 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) | Yoga Pro 9 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 271.1 mm | 254 mm | +17.1 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 363 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 18 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.9 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) better than Yoga Pro 9 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 84 Wh+7%
- CPU cores20 vs 16+25%
- G-Sync / FreeSyncYes · Yoga Pro 9 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · Yoga Pro 9 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Yoga Pro 9 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025): No
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 1,000 GB+2%
Why is Yoga Pro 9 16 G10 RTX 5070 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)10.8 TFLOPS vs 23.2 TFLOPS2.1×
- GPU power (TGP)70 W vs 100 W+43%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,593 vs 14,422+68%
- Resolution classQHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Brightness500 nits vs 1,000 nits2×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.93 kg+19%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 64 GB4×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025): Yes
- Thickness19.9 mm vs 18 mm+11%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 70 W | 100 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.8 TFLOPS | 23.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,593 | 14,422 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 9 285H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 7 255H, Core Ultra 9 285H |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,015 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,055 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,860 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 3200 × 2000 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | 3K (1800p/2000p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 1,000 nits |
| sRGB coverage | — | 100% |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 212 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | No |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 8,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 84 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 170 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.93 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 18 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 363 mm |
| Depth | 271.1 mm | 254 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Blue | Green |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 52.7 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | — | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 6 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.6vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsLenovo Legion 5 15 G11 RTX 5050 (2026)7.47.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA403 RTX 5060 (2025)7.46.9vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAsus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Radeon 8060S (2025)7.47.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.3vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3 RTX 4070 (2025)7.47.4