Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) vs Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) does better (8) and where ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display7.6
8.1Memory & storage4.7
3.8Battery & portability8.9
6.6Features & cooling8.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) | ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 271.1 mm | 204 mm | +67.1 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 300 mm | +60.1 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 15 mm | +4.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.2 kg | +1.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) better than ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 70 Wh+29%
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Panel typeOLED vs IPS
- CPU cores20 vs 16+25%
- HDMI 2.1Yes · ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025): No
- Screen size16″ vs 13.4″+19%
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 1,000 GB+2%
Why is ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)?
- Weight2.3 kg vs 1.2 kg+92%
- Thickness19.9 mm vs 15 mm+33%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5
- Max. supported RAM64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Radeon 8060S |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | AMD |
| GPU power (TGP) | 70 W | — |
| Video memory | 8 GB | — |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | — |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 10.8 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,593 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 20 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 19,015 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,055 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,860 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 13.4″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| Response time | 1 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 100% | — |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Touchscreen | No | Yes |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 70 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 1.2 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 15 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 300 mm |
| Depth | 271.1 mm | 204 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | — | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5060 (2025)7.37.3
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ A3 RTX 4070 (2025)7.37.4
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsAsus TUF Gaming A14 FA401 RTX 5050 (2025)7.37.1
vs
Acer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025)7.27.6
vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025)7.47.6
vs
MSI Stealth A16 AI+ RTX 4060 (2025)vsAsus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025)7.77.6
