- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) vs Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) does better (3) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.8Display9.8
2.8Memory & storage3.7
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Panel typeOLED vs Mini-LED
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025): No
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025): No
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 99 Wh+30%
- SSD (up to)1,000 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Refresh rate240 Hz vs 300 Hz+25%
- Video memory16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
- GPU shader cores7,680 vs 10,496+37%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 7,680 | 10,496 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 24 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.5 GHz | — |
| Processor options | — | Core Ultra 9 275HX, Ryzen 9 9955HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | OLED | Mini-LED |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.3 kg | — |
| Thickness | 20 mm | — |
| Width | 357 mm | — |
| Depth | 276 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)5.05.3
vsAcer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-A31 RTX 5050 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)5.25.3
vsMSI Prestige 14 AI Studio RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)5.35.3
vsDell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)4.95.3
vsLenovo Yoga Pro 7i 14 9 RTX 4060 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5080 (2025)5.55.3
vs
MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XW RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5090 (2025)8.88.6