- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (8) and where Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (18) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Graphics7.8
6.4Overall performance8.1
7.5Display8.8
5.1Memory & storage3.8
3.4Battery & portability3.3
6.2Features & cooling4.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) | Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 260 mm | +19.9 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 363 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 27 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.6 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 80 Wh+12%
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- SD card readerYes · Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Response time4 ms vs 7 ms+75%
- Key travel1.8 mm vs 1.5 mm+20%
- DCI-P3 coverage80% vs 71%+13%
Why is Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)13.4 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS+63%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,494 vs 13,240+56%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 240 Hz+45%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- Weight2.8 kg vs 2.6 kg+8%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- HDRNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- CPU cores14 vs 16+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.4 TFLOPS | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,494 | 13,240 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-13500HX | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX | Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX, Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,540 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,522 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 970 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 99% |
| Response time | 4 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 80% | 71% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 80 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 300 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.6 kg |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 27 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 363 mm |
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 260 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 62.7 dB | 54.7 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | USB4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 4 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023)6.46.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)6.46.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4060 (2023)6.46.7vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.46.7
vs
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023)vsGigabyte Aero 16 OLED BSF RTX 4070 (2023)7.67.7
vsAsus TUF Gaming F15 TUF507 RTX 4070 (2023)vsLenovo Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 RTX 4070 (2023)7.77.6