Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Asus ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4060 (2023)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (9) and where ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4060 (2023) wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Graphics6.5
6.4Overall performance6.7
7.5Display7.2
5.1Memory & storage4.6
3.4Battery & portability3.1
6.2Features & cooling5.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4060 (2023)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) | ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4060 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 282 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 395 mm | −34.9 mm |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 31 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.8 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) better than ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4060 (2023)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4060 (2023): No
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Brightness400 nits vs 300 nits+33%
- CPU cores14 vs 12+17%
- Thickness28.2 mm vs 31 mm+10%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Webcam1,080p vs 720p+50%
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 127 ppi+12%
Why is ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4060 (2023) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,494 vs 11,292+33%
- GPU compute (FP32)13.4 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS+19%
- Video memory6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- HDRNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Max. supported RAM32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 3,072+20%
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Response time4 ms vs 3 ms+33%
- Fan noise (max. load)62.7 dB vs 49 dB+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 140 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 3,072 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.4 TFLOPS | 16 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,494 | 11,292 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-13500HX | Ryzen 9 7940HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | 12 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 9 7940HS, Ryzen 9 7940HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,540 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,522 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 970 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 17.3″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 300 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 4 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 80% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 127 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 280 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.8 kg |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 31 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 395 mm |
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 282 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 62.7 dB | 49 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.9 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 720p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023)6.46.4
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)6.46.4
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Major X20 RTX 4070 (2023)6.46.7
vs
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAsus ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4060 (2023)8.26.7
vs
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4060 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 3070 (2022)6.73.6
vs
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513 RTX 3060 (2022)vsAsus ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4060 (2023)5.86.7
