Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) vs HP Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (11) and where Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023) wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Graphics8.7
6.3Overall performance7.6
7.6Display5.6
4.9Memory & storage3.6
3.4Battery & portability7.7
6.2Features & cooling5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) | Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 259 mm | +20.9 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 369 mm | −8.9 mm |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 24 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.4 kg | +0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 83 Wh+8%
- CPU cores14 vs 8+75%
- Brightness400 nits vs 250 nits+60%
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 144 Hz+15%
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023): No
- Response time4 ms vs 7 ms+75%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Pixel density142 ppi vs 137 ppi+4%
- Max CPU clock4.7 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+2%
Why is Omen 16 RTX 4070 (2023) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Video memory6 GB vs 32 GB5.3×
- GPU compute (FP32)13.4 TFLOPS vs 21.8 TFLOPS+63%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,494 vs 13,065+54%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 4,608+80%
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 145 W+4%
- Weight2.8 kg vs 2.36 kg+19%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- Advanced OptimusNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023): Yes
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Thickness28.2 mm vs 24 mm+18%
- RAM speed4,800 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 145 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 32 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 4,608 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.4 TFLOPS | 21.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,494 | 13,065 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-13500HX | Core i7-13700HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 14 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX | Core i5-13420H, Core i5-13500H, Ryzen 5 7640HS, Core i7-13620H, Core i7-13700HX, Ryzen 7 7840HS, Core i9-13900HX, Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,540 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,522 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 970 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16.1″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 250 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 4 ms | 7 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 80% | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 137 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.36 kg |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 369 mm |
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 62.7 dB | 58.3 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)6.46.3vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4050 (2023)6.46.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)6.46.3
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4070 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)8.26.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023)6.46.3
vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 14 PHN14-51 RTX 4050 (2024)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)6.26.4