- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) vs ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) does better (5) and where ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) wins (24) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Graphics9.7
6.3Overall performance9.4
7.6Display9.3
4.9Memory & storage5.3
3.4Battery & portability3.6
6.2Features & cooling6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) | ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 266 mm | +13.9 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 355 mm | +5.1 mm |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 30 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.7 kg | +0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023) better than ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)?
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023): No
- Thickness28.2 mm vs 30 mm+6%
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 2,000 GB+2%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Key travel1.8 mm vs 1.7 mm+6%
Why is ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- GPU compute (FP32)13.4 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS3.4×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light8,494 vs 26,4243.1×
- Video memory6 GB vs 16 GB2.7×
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 9,7283.8×
- Brightness400 nits vs 1,100 nits2.8×
- Geekbench 6 multi-core11,540 vs 19,038+65%
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 175 W+25%
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core970 vs 1,9612×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 240 Hz+45%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 32 GB4×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 2,000 GB3.9×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 9,728 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 13.4 TFLOPS | 45.2 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 8,494 | 26,424 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i5-13500HX | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 14 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 32 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13500HX, Core i7-13700HX, Core i9-13900HX | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,540 | 19,038 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,522 | 3,105 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 970 | 1,961 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 1,100 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 4 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 80% | 99% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 4,800 MHz | 4,800 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.67 kg |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 355 mm |
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 266 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black, Gray | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 62.7 dB | 56 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet | — | 5 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 1.8 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 6 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 4060 (2023)6.46.3vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsAsus ROG Strix G17 G713 RTX 4050 (2023)6.46.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 HX 13V RTX 4070 (2023)6.46.3vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-71 RTX 4050 (2023)vsMSI Raider 18 HX A14 RTX 4080 (2023)6.46.3
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsGigabyte Aorus 17X RTX 4090 (2023)8.99.2vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650 RTX 4090 (2023)vsMSI Raider GE68 RTX 4090 (2023)8.99.0