Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025) vs Asus ROG Strix SCAR 16 G635 RTX 5080 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025) does better (11) and where ROG Strix SCAR 16 G635 RTX 5080 (2025) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.7Graphics9.4
9.4Overall performance9.4
7.9Display9.6
8.6Memory & storage9.2
5.0Battery & portability3.0
8.5Features & cooling9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)ROG Strix SCAR 16 G635 RTX 5080 (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025) | ROG Strix SCAR 16 G635 RTX 5080 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 268 mm | +7.5 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 354 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 30.8 mm | −4 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.8 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025) better than ROG Strix SCAR 16 G635 RTX 5080 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)48.9 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS+16%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light28,857 vs 24,982+16%
- Video memory24 GB vs 16 GB+50%
- Weight2.66 kg vs 2.85 kg+7%
- GPU shader cores10,496 vs 7,680+37%
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · ROG Strix SCAR 16 G635 RTX 5080 (2025): No
- SD card readerYes · ROG Strix SCAR 16 G635 RTX 5080 (2025): No
- Thickness26.8 mm vs 30.8 mm+15%
- Key travel2 mm vs 1.7 mm+18%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%
- Fan noise (max. load)54 dB vs 57.2 dB+6%
Why is ROG Strix SCAR 16 G635 RTX 5080 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Brightness400 nits vs 1,200 nits3×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeIPS vs Mini-LED
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB2×
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 240 Hz+33%
- GPU power (TGP)165 W vs 175 W+6%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core18,758 vs 19,340+3%
- HDRNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025): Yes
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
- Cooling fans2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 165 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 7,680 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 48.9 TFLOPS | 42 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 28,857 | 24,982 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 7 255HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 20 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 20 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 18,758 | 19,340 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,042 | 3,109 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,855 | 1,876 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | Mini-LED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 1,200 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 8,192 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 380 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.66 kg | 2.85 kg |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 30.8 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 268 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 57.2 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 2 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.39.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsGigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5080 (2025)9.39.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026)9.38.5vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5080 (2026)9.39.0