- pan.tf
- Compare
- Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025) vs Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025) vs Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025) does better (7) and where Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Memory & storage2.6
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025) better than Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Video memory24 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Thunderbolt or USB4Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- GPU shader cores10,496 vs 5,888+78%
- HDMI 2.1Yes · Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025): No
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 1,000 GB+2%
Why is Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)?
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 300 Hz+67%
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
- RAM (base)16 GB vs 32 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 165 W | — |
| Video memory | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 10,496 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 48.9 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 28,857 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | AMD |
| CPU cores | 20 | — |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | — |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 18,758 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,042 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,855 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1440 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 400 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 3 ms | — |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.66 kg | — |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | — |
| Width | 356.8 mm | — |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | No |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 2 mm | — |
| Webcam | 1,080p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsHP Omen Max 16 RTX 5090 (2025)9.39.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsGigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5080 (2025)9.39.4vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5060 (2026)9.38.5vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 (2026)9.38.7vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5090 (2025)vsAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5050 (2026)9.37.2