Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (7) and where Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025) wins (21) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Graphics9.8
9.2Overall performance9.7
7.9Display9.7
8.6Memory & storage7.1
5.0Battery & portability5.7
8.5Features & cooling9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 276 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 364 mm | −7.2 mm |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 27 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.7 kg | −0.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Weight2.66 kg vs 2.72 kg+2%
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- SD card readerYes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- IR camera (face login)Yes · Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- Key travel2 mm vs 1.5 mm+33%
- SSD (base)1,024 GB vs 1,000 GB+2%
Why is Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)31.2 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS+65%
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light20,231 vs 31,227+54%
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 175 W+25%
- Video memory12 GB vs 24 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 240 Hz+33%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 10,496+78%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- Brightness400 nits vs 500 nits+25%
- Advanced OptimusNo · Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 31.2 TFLOPS | 51.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 20,231 | 31,227 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 20 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX, Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 18,758 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,042 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,855 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 400 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.66 kg | 2.72 kg |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 27 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 364 mm |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 276 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 53.9 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Key travel | 2 mm | 1.5 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,440p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.19.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Fusion 16 RTX 5060 (2025)9.19.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.19.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsThunderobot Radiant S16 RTX 5060 (2025)9.19.0