Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
What Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (8) and where Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025) wins (26) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Graphics9.7
9.2Overall performance9.6
7.9Display9.7
8.6Memory & storage5.3
5.0Battery & portability6.4
8.5Features & cooling9.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
| Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 254 mm | +21.5 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 357 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 30 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 2.5 kg | +0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025)?
- RAM (up to)64 GB vs 32 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 2,000 GB2×
- Liquid metal (CPU)Yes · Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025): No
- Thickness26.8 mm vs 30 mm+12%
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
- Fan noise (max. load)54 dB vs 66.5 dB+23%
- Key travel2 mm vs 1.7 mm+18%
- RAM speed6,400 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+14%
Why is Aorus Master 16 RTX 5090 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)31.2 TFLOPS vs 51.4 TFLOPS+65%
- GPU power (TGP)140 W vs 175 W+25%
- Video memory12 GB vs 24 GB2×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel typeIPS vs OLED
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light20,231 vs 29,020+43%
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 99 Wh+10%
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 240 Hz+33%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 10,496+78%
- Geekbench 6 multi-core18,758 vs 21,789+16%
- Response time3 ms vs 1 ms3×
- Weight2.66 kg vs 2.5 kg+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 140 W | 175 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 24 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 10,496 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 31.2 TFLOPS | 51.4 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 20,231 | 29,020 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core Ultra 7 255HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 20 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 20 | 24 |
| Max CPU clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 18,758 | 21,789 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 3,042 | 3,196 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 1,855 | 2,049 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | OLED |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Response time | 3 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | No | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 2,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,024 GB | 2,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 99 Wh |
| Power adapter | 330 W | 330 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.66 kg | 2.5 kg |
| Thickness | 26.8 mm | 30 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 254 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | No |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 54 dB | 66.5 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 5 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | 2 mm | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 1,080p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 4 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5080 (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMedion Erazer Beast 16 X1 Ultimate RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsLenovo Legion Pro 7 16 G10 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.19.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsXMG Fusion 16 RTX 5060 (2025)9.19.0vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Strix Scar 16 G635 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)9.19.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 AI RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsThunderobot Radiant S16 RTX 5060 (2025)9.19.0