- pan.tf
- Compare
- Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) vs Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
What Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) does better (3) and where Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) wins (22) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Score
Higher score 22 advantages≈ $2,450
4.3Graphics9.0
3.7Overall performance9.7
3.4Display9.6
5.4Memory & storage7.0
3.1Battery & portability2.2
6.1Features & cooling4.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
| Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) | Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 264 mm | 276 mm | −12 mm |
| Width | 357.7 mm | 357 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 20 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2.3 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025) better than Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Weight2.1 kg vs 2.3 kg+10%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%
Why is Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)?
- GPU compute (FP32)12.2 TFLOPS vs 26.8 TFLOPS2.2×
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light9,024 vs 19,7832.2×
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 64 GB2×
- CPU cores8 vs 243×
- GPU power (TGP)85 W vs 115 W+35%
- GPU shader cores2,560 vs 5,8882.3×
- Resolution classFull HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 240 Hz+33%
- Brightness300 nits vs 500 nits+67%
- Video memory8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Response time4 ms vs 1 ms4×
- HDRNo · Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 85 W | 115 W |
| Video memory | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,560 | 5,888 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 12.2 TFLOPS | 26.8 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 9,024 | 19,783 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core 5 210H | Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 8 | 24 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Processor options | Core 5 210H, Ryzen 5 240, Ryzen 7 8845HS, Core 7 240H, Ryzen 7 260, Ryzen AI 7 350, Core Ultra 7 355, Core 9 270H, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Core Ultra 7 255HX, Core Ultra 9 275HX |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 9,130 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,523 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 594 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | — | OLED |
| Brightness | 300 nits | 500 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 98% | — |
| Response time | 4 ms | 1 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 72% | 100% |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | Yes |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | Yes |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 6,400 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM slots | 2 | 2 |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | Yes |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 76 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 230 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging power | 100 W | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 20 mm |
| Width | 357.7 mm | 357 mm |
| Depth | 264 mm | 276 mm |
| Body material | Aluminium, Plastic | Aluminium, Plastic |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 2 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | No |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | Yes |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 53.3 dB | 54 dB |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 3 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | Single-colour RGB |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | Yes |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Omen Transcend 14 RTX 5070 (2025)4.65.0vs
Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsHonor Magicbook Pro 16 RTX 4060 (2024)4.64.5vs
Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsInfinix GT Book RTX 4060 (2024)4.64.8vs
Acer Nitro V 16S AI RTX 5050 (2025)vsDell Inspiron 16 Plus 7640 RTX 4060 (2024)4.64.9
vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ProArt P16 H7606 RTX 5060 (2025)8.89.1vs
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsMSI Stealth A16 AI+ RTX 5090 (2025)8.89.1