Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023) vs Asus TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)
What Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023) does better (4) and where TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Display4.2
2.9Memory & storage2.4
5.1Battery & portability9.4
3.7Features & cooling6.4
Why is Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023) better than TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023)?
- Video memory16 GB vs 6 GB2.7×
- Weight2.1 kg vs 2.27 kg+8%
- CPU cores10 vs 8+25%
- Max CPU clock4.9 GHz vs 4.8 GHz+2%
Why is TUF Gaming F16 TUF607 RTX 4050 (2023) better than Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023)?
- Battery capacity57 Wh vs 90 Wh+58%
- GPU shader cores2,048 vs 2,560+25%
- RAM speed5,200 MHz vs 5,600 MHz+8%
- Screen size15.6″ vs 16″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 65 W | — |
| Video memory | 16 GB | 6 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 6.1 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 4,646 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Core i7-13620H | Core 5 210H |
| CPU maker | Intel | Intel |
| CPU cores | 10 | 8 |
| Max CPU clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Processor options | Core i5-13420H, Core i7-13620H, Core i9-13900H | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 15.6″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1080 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 60% | — |
| Response time | 30 ms | — |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 40% | — |
| Pixel density | 141 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | No | — |
| MUX switch | No | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| RAM speed | 5,200 MHz | 5,600 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 1,000 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 57 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 2.27 kg |
| Thickness | 27 mm | — |
| Width | 362 mm | — |
| Depth | 240 mm | — |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Grey |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 51 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | 1 Gbit/s | — |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | No | — |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | — |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | — |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsHP Victus 15 RTX 4050 (2023)3.93.8vs
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsAcer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41 RTX 4060 (2024)3.94.8vs
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsMSI Cyborg 15 A13 RTX 4060 (2023)3.94.2vs
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsGigabyte G6 RTX 4050 (2023)3.94.0vs
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023)vsMedion Erazer Scout E30 RTX 4050 (2023)3.93.6
vsAcer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024)vsAcer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023)5.23.9