vs
4.9Memory & storage2.2
8.7Battery & portability7.3
8.2Features & cooling7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024)Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)
| Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024) | Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 234 mm | 259 mm | −25 mm |
| Width | 328 mm | 369 mm | −41 mm |
| Thickness | 21 mm | 24 mm | −3 mm |
| Weight | 1.7 kg | 2.4 kg | −0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024) better than Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Weight1.7 kg vs 2.39 kg+41%
- Thickness21 mm vs 24 mm+14%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Why is Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) better than Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024)?
- Battery capacity57 Wh vs 83 Wh+46%
- CPU cores6 vs 162.7×
- Response time7 ms vs 3 ms2.3×
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- Screen size14.5″ vs 16.1″+11%
- Max CPU clock5 GHz vs 5.3 GHz+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 2,048 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 3.2 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 2,478 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 6 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,031 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,671 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 724 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14.5″ | 16.1″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | 3 ms |
| Pixel density | 156 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 57 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 1.7 kg | 2.39 kg |
| Thickness | 21 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 328 mm | 369 mm |
| Depth | 234 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | White | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | No | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 2 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | No | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)5.25.4vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.25.4vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Deputy P60 RTX 4070 (2024)5.25.0vs
Acer Nitro V 14 ANV14-61 RTX 2050 (2024)vsAcer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51 RTX 3050 (2023)5.23.9
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.35.3
vsHP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.15.3