Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) vs Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025)
What Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) does better (9) and where ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025) wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Graphics5.0
8.1Overall performance6.2
7.7Display7.2
5.4Memory & storage6.9
2.2Battery & portability9.3
3.5Features & cooling8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025)
| Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) | ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 246 mm | +29.5 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 354 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 17.2 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 1.8 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) better than ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025)?
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light18,910 vs 9,4322×
- GPU compute (FP32)26.8 TFLOPS vs 13.6 TFLOPS+97%
- GPU shader cores5,888 vs 2,5602.3×
- GPU power (TGP)115 W vs 100 W+15%
- Video memory12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Brightness500 nits vs 400 nits+25%
- Advanced OptimusYes · ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025): No
- Upgradable RAMYes · ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025): No
- USB-A ports3 vs 2+50%
Why is ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025) better than Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)?
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB2×
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 90 Wh+18%
- Refresh rate180 Hz vs 240 Hz+33%
- Weight2.18 kg vs 1.85 kg+18%
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- RAM typeDDR5 vs LPDDR5X
- Vapor chamber coolingNo · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- IR camera (face login)No · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- Dolby AtmosNo · Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025): Yes
- Thickness20 mm vs 17.2 mm+16%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 7+8%
- Cooling fans2 vs 3+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 115 W | 100 W |
| Video memory | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| GPU shader cores | 5,888 | 2,560 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 26.8 TFLOPS | 13.6 TFLOPS |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 18,910 | 9,432 |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen AI 7 350 | Ryzen AI 7 350 |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU threads | 16 | 16 |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 365 | Ryzen AI 7 350, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 13,587 | 13,586 |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,862 | 2,864 |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 896 | 895 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Resolution | 2560 × 1600 | 2560 × 1600 |
| Resolution class | QHD (1440p/1600p) | QHD (1440p/1600p) |
| Refresh rate | 180 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Panel type | IPS | IPS |
| Brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | — | 3 ms |
| DCI-P3 coverage | — | 100% |
| Pixel density | 189 ppi | 189 ppi |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | No |
| MUX switch | Yes | Yes |
| HDR | No | No |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | 7,500 MHz |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | No |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 4,096 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | 2 |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Power adapter | 135 W | 200 W |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | Yes |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.18 kg | 1.85 kg |
| Thickness | 20 mm | 17.2 mm |
| Width | 356.8 mm | 354 mm |
| Depth | 275.5 mm | 246 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Colours | Black | White, Gray |
| Cooling fans | 2 | 3 |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | Yes |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | USB4 | — |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | No |
| USB-C ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB-A ports | 3 | 2 |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | No |
| Ethernet port | Yes | No |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Keyboard backlight | Single-colour RGB | — |
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | Yes |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | No |
| Key travel | — | 1.7 mm |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint reader | No | No |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)7.47.2vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5060 (2025)7.48.0vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsAsus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302 Radeon 8060S (2025)7.47.6vs
Acer Nitro 16S AI AN16S-61 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)7.47.6
vs
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025)vsGigabyte Aero X16 RTX 5070 (2025)7.57.7vsAcer Predator Triton 14 PT14-52 RTX 5070 (2025)vsAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605 RTX 5050 (2025)7.27.5