vs
6.3Memory & storage2.2
4.5Battery & portability7.3
6.6Features & cooling7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 3050 (2024)Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)
| Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 3050 (2024) | Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 259 mm | +20.9 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 369 mm | −8.9 mm |
| Thickness | 27.9 mm | 24 mm | +3.9 mm |
| Weight | 2.6 kg | 2.4 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 3050 (2024) better than Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (up to)4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB4.1×
- Battery capacity90 Wh vs 83 Wh+8%
- Video memory6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Why is Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) better than Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 3050 (2024)?
- CPU cores6 vs 162.7×
- Thunderbolt or USB4No · Nitro 16 AN16-42 RTX 3050 (2024): Yes
- Weight2.65 kg vs 2.39 kg+11%
- Response time7 ms vs 3 ms2.3×
- RAM (base)8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Thickness27.9 mm vs 24 mm+16%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- Max CPU clock5 GHz vs 5.3 GHz+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 2,048 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 4.3 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 3,719 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 6 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS, Ryzen 9 8945HS | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,750 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,826 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 762 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 16″ | 16.1″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | 3 ms |
| Pixel density | 142 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5 | — |
| RAM speed | 5,600 MHz | — |
| Max. supported RAM | 32 GB | — |
| RAM slots | 2 | — |
| Upgradable RAM | Yes | — |
| SSD (up to) | 4,096 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 2 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 90 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.65 kg | 2.39 kg |
| Thickness | 27.9 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 360.1 mm | 369 mm |
| Depth | 279.9 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | No | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 1 | — |
| USB-A ports | 4 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | Yes | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Key travel | 1.4 mm | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.35.3
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.15.3
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)6.85.3
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5050 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.25.3
vs
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.45.3
vs
MSI Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)5.85.3

