vs
4.3Memory & storage2.2
8.9Battery & portability7.3
7.6Features & cooling7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Nitro 14 AMD AN14-41 RTX 3050 (2024)Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)
| Nitro 14 AMD AN14-41 RTX 3050 (2024) | Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth | 255.9 mm | 259 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Width | 324.1 mm | 369 mm | −44.9 mm |
| Thickness | 22.8 mm | 24 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 2 kg | 2.4 kg | −0.4 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Nitro 14 AMD AN14-41 RTX 3050 (2024) better than Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)?
- RAM (up to)32 GB vs 16 GB2×
- SSD (up to)2,048 GB vs 1,000 GB2×
- Weight2.02 kg vs 2.39 kg+18%
- Video memory6 GB vs 4 GB+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
- Thickness22.8 mm vs 24 mm+5%
Why is Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024) better than Nitro 14 AMD AN14-41 RTX 3050 (2024)?
- CPU cores6 vs 162.7×
- Battery capacity76 Wh vs 83 Wh+9%
- Response time7 ms vs 3 ms2.3×
- SSD (base)512 GB vs 1,000 GB+95%
- Webcam720p vs 1,080p+50%
- Screen size14″ vs 16.1″+15%
- Max CPU clock5 GHz vs 5.3 GHz+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Graphics | ||
| Graphics card | GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop | GeForce RTX 2050 Laptop |
| GPU maker | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| GPU power (TGP) | 80 W | — |
| Video memory | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Video memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| GPU shader cores | 2,048 | 2,048 |
| GPU compute (FP32) | 7.1 TFLOPS | — |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light | 5,160 | — |
| Processor | ||
| Processor | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 9 8940HX |
| CPU maker | AMD | AMD |
| CPU cores | 6 | 16 |
| CPU threads | 12 | — |
| Max CPU clock | 5 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Processor options | Ryzen 5 8645HS, Ryzen 7 8845HS | — |
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 11,444 | — |
| Geekbench 6 single-core | 2,689 | — |
| Cinebench 2024 multi-core | 737 | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 14″ | 16.1″ |
| Resolution | 1920 × 1200 | 1920 × 1200 |
| Resolution class | Full HD (1080p/1200p) | Full HD (1080p/1200p) |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Panel type | IPS | — |
| Brightness | 500 nits | — |
| sRGB coverage | 100% | — |
| Response time | 7 ms | 3 ms |
| Pixel density | 162 ppi | — |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| G-Sync / FreeSync | Yes | — |
| Advanced Optimus | Yes | — |
| MUX switch | Yes | — |
| HDR | No | — |
| Touchscreen | No | — |
| Memory & storage | ||
| RAM (up to) | 32 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM (base) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X | — |
| RAM speed | 6,400 MHz | — |
| Upgradable RAM | No | — |
| SSD (up to) | 2,048 GB | 1,000 GB |
| SSD (base) | 512 GB | 1,000 GB |
| M.2 SSD slots | 1 | — |
| SSD interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | — |
| Battery & power | ||
| Battery capacity | 76 Wh | 83 Wh |
| Power adapter | 230 W | — |
| USB-C charging (Power Delivery) | Yes | — |
| Design & cooling | ||
| Weight | 2.02 kg | 2.39 kg |
| Thickness | 22.8 mm | 24 mm |
| Width | 324.1 mm | 369 mm |
| Depth | 255.9 mm | 259 mm |
| Body material | Plastic | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Cooling fans | 2 | — |
| Vapor chamber cooling | No | — |
| Liquid metal (CPU) | Yes | — |
| Fan noise (max. load) | 57 dB | — |
| Ports & wireless | ||
| Thunderbolt / USB4 | Thunderbolt 4 | Thunderbolt 4 |
| Thunderbolt or USB4 | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C ports | 2 | — |
| USB-A ports | 3 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | HDMI 2.1 |
| HDMI 2.1 | Yes | Yes |
| (Mini) DisplayPort | No | — |
| Ethernet | — | 1 Gbit/s |
| Ethernet port | No | Yes |
| SD card reader | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Keyboard & camera | ||
| Backlit keyboard | Yes | — |
| Numeric keypad | Yes | — |
| Webcam | 720p | 1,080p |
| IR camera (face login) | No | — |
| Fingerprint reader | No | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speakers | 2.0 | 2 speakers |
| Dolby Atmos | No | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Acer Nitro 14 AMD AN14-41 RTX 3050 (2024)vsAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA608 RTX 4060 (2024)5.65.4
vs
Acer Nitro 14 AMD AN14-41 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMedion Erazer Beast X40 RTX 4080 (2024)5.65.4
vs
Acer Nitro 14 AMD AN14-41 RTX 3050 (2024)vsMSI Katana A15 AI B8 RTX 4070 (2024)5.65.8
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.35.3
vs
HP Omen 17 RTX 5070 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)7.15.3
vs
HP Omen 16 RTX 5060 (2025)vsHP Omen 16 RTX 2050 (2024)6.85.3
