≈ $5,200
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- Resolution class 4K (2160p/2400p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 4,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Weight 3.3 kg vs 3.1 kg
Alternatives to Razer Blade 18 RTX 5080 (2025)
10 desktop replacements at a similar price that compete with the Blade 18 RTX 5080 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Blade 18 RTX 5080 (2025)
≈ $7,600
- Resolution class 4K (2160p/2400p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 92 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 300 Hz
≈ $6,600
- Resolution class 4K (2160p/2400p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 92 Wh
- Max. supported RAM 192 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Panel type IPS vs Mini-LED
≈ $4,800
- RAM (up to) 128 GB vs 64 GB
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 500 nits
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 92 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Refresh rate 250 Hz vs 300 Hz
≈ $5,400
- RAM (up to) 192 GB vs 64 GB
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 92 Wh
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 300 Hz
- Weight 3.5 kg vs 3.1 kg
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 64 GB
- Battery capacity 96 Wh vs 92 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS
- Panel type IPS vs Mini-LED
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 19,606 vs 22,639
≈ $4,300
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 500 nits
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 92 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 28,453 vs 27,655
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
≈ $5,900
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 64 GB
- Resolution class 4K (2160p/2400p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 500 nits
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 300 Hz
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- RAM (up to) 192 GB vs 64 GB
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 500 nits
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 92 Wh
- Refresh rate 250 Hz vs 300 Hz
- Weight 3.2 kg vs 3.1 kg
≈ $6,700
- Resolution class 4K (2160p/2400p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 92 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 300 Hz
- Weight 3.6 kg vs 3.1 kg