≈ $6,400
- Resolution class 4K (2160p/2400p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 2.1 kg
- CPU cores 12 vs 8
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
Alternatives to Razer Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Blade 16 RTX 5090 (2025)
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 16,071 vs 13,856
- Weight 1.95 kg vs 2.1 kg
- GPU power (TGP) 120 W vs 160 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 31 TFLOPS vs 47.7 TFLOPS
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 16,071 vs 13,856
- Weight 1.95 kg vs 2.1 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.8 TFLOPS vs 47.7 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 160 W
≈ $5,000
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Weight 1.95 kg vs 2.1 kg
- Brightness 500 nits vs 400 nits
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 16,071 vs 13,856
- Weight 1.95 kg vs 2.1 kg
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,742 vs 28,136
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 47.7 TFLOPS
≈ $4,700
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 400 nits
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 17,034 vs 13,856
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 16,071 vs 13,856
- Weight 1.95 kg vs 2.1 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 47.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,687 vs 28,136
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 17,034 vs 13,856
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 2.1 kg
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 27,336 vs 28,136
≈ $3,700
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 400 nits
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 17,034 vs 13,856
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 17,034 vs 13,856
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 2.1 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 47.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,410 vs 28,136