≈ $5,000
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.9 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,671 vs 12,623
- Video memory 24 GB vs 8 GB
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
Alternatives to Razer Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2025)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Blade 16 RTX 5060 (2025)
≈ $6,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.9 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,718 vs 12,623
- Video memory 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
≈ $2,450
- CPU cores 24 vs 8
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 19,783 vs 12,623
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.8 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 90 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,115 vs 12,623
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.8 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB
- USB-A ports 2 vs 3
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,742 vs 12,623
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB
- USB-A ports 2 vs 3
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 16,071 vs 13,856
- Weight 1.95 kg vs 2.1 kg
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB
- USB-A ports 2 vs 3
- GPU compute (FP32) 31 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,144 vs 12,623
- GPU shader cores 7,680 vs 3,328
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 8,192 GB
- USB-A ports 2 vs 3
- GPU compute (FP32) 35.4 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 23,363 vs 12,623
- Video memory 24 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
≈ $4,600
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,359 vs 12,623
- GPU compute (FP32) 31 TFLOPS vs 18.4 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 7,680 vs 3,328
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
≈ $3,700
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 400 nits
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 18,998 vs 12,623
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 8,192 GB