≈ $4,100
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 95 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,935 vs 23,692
- Brightness 500 nits vs 400 nits
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
Alternatives to Razer Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2024)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2024) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Blade 16 RTX 4090 (2024)
≈ $4,600
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 31,227 vs 23,692
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 95 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 400 nits
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 95 Wh
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Panel type Mini-LED vs OLED
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 400 nits
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 95 Wh
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Panel type Mini-LED vs OLED
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 400 nits
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,991 vs 23,692
- Liquid metal (CPU)
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Panel type Mini-LED vs OLED
≈ $4,900
- Brightness 1,200 nits vs 400 nits
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 29,079 vs 23,692
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 8,192 GB
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 400 nits
- Liquid metal (CPU)
- Key travel 2 mm vs 1 mm
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Panel type Mini-LED vs OLED
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 400 nits
- Refresh rate 250 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Liquid metal (CPU)
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Panel type Mini-LED vs OLED
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 30,937 vs 23,692
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
- Video memory 24 GB vs 16 GB
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- Weight 3.15 kg vs 2.45 kg
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 27,653 vs 23,692
- SSD (up to) 12,288 GB vs 8,192 GB
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 19,766 vs 19,017
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- Weight 3.15 kg vs 2.45 kg