15% cheaper ≈ $2,400
- GPU power (TGP) 90 W vs 70 W
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
Alternatives to Razer Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Blade 15 Advanced RTX 3060 (2021)
Same price ≈ $2,900
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 70 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,687 vs 6,958
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 10.7 TFLOPS
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- Upgradable RAM
17% pricier ≈ $3,300
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
5% cheaper ≈ $2,700
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 80 Wh
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
16% cheaper ≈ $2,350
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 70 W
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 80 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,220 vs 6,958
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- USB-A ports 1 vs 3
12% cheaper ≈ $2,450
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 80 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
Same price ≈ $2,900
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 80 Wh
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
35% cheaper ≈ $1,850
- GPU power (TGP) 120 W vs 70 W
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 80 Wh
- CPU cores 14 vs 8
- Video memory 6 GB vs 16 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
41% cheaper ≈ $1,650
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 1.6 kg vs 2.1 kg
- Battery capacity 82 Wh vs 80 Wh
- GPU shader cores 1,536 vs 3,840
- CPU cores 4 vs 8
17% cheaper ≈ $2,350
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- CPU cores 24 vs 8
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Video memory 8 GB vs 16 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz