≈ $6,800
- GPU compute (FP32) 33.9 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 150 W vs 105 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,090 vs 12,672
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 360 Hz
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 100 Wh
Alternatives to MSI Stealth 17 Studio RTX 4070 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Stealth 17 Studio RTX 4070 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Stealth 17 Studio RTX 4070 (2023)
- GPU power (TGP) 130 W vs 105 W
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 14
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 360 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 130 W vs 105 W
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- GPU shader cores 5,632 vs 4,608
- CPU cores 8 vs 14
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 360 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- Weight 2.28 kg vs 2.8 kg
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,296 vs 798
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,386 vs 12,672
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- Weight 2.28 kg vs 2.8 kg
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 1,296 vs 798
- USB-C ports 1 vs 2
- SD card reader
- GPU power (TGP) 165 W vs 105 W
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 14
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 360 Hz
≈ $2,050
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Refresh rate 480 Hz vs 360 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 105 W
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 100 Wh
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.8 kg
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 105 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,557 vs 12,672
- CPU cores 8 vs 14
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 360 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 105 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 25,985 vs 12,672
- CPU cores 8 vs 14
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 360 Hz
≈ $5,000
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 105 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,424 vs 12,672
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 360 Hz