≈ $6,800
- GPU compute (FP32) 33.9 TFLOPS vs 11.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,090 vs 8,370
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,560
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 360 Hz
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 100 Wh
Alternatives to MSI Stealth 17 Studio RTX 4050 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Stealth 17 Studio RTX 4050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Stealth 17 Studio RTX 4050 (2023)
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,560
- GPU compute (FP32) 20.7 TFLOPS vs 11.7 TFLOPS
- CPU cores 8 vs 14
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 360 Hz
- GPU shader cores 5,632 vs 2,560
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,723 vs 8,370
- GPU power (TGP) 130 W vs 105 W
- CPU cores 8 vs 14
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 360 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 11.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,386 vs 8,370
- USB-C ports 1 vs 2
- SD card reader
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 11.7 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,175 vs 8,370
- USB-C ports 1 vs 2
- SD card reader
≈ $6,200
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,560
- Video memory 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 100 Wh
- Thickness 30 mm vs 20.8 mm
- GPU power (TGP) 165 W vs 105 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 11.7 TFLOPS
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 14
- Refresh rate 300 Hz vs 360 Hz
≈ $2,050
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,048 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,900 vs 8,370
- GPU compute (FP32) 20 TFLOPS vs 11.7 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 100 Wh
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.8 kg
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,048 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,190 vs 8,370
- Refresh rate 480 Hz vs 360 Hz
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 100 Wh
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.8 kg
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Refresh rate 480 Hz vs 360 Hz
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 105 W
- Battery capacity 86 Wh vs 100 Wh
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.8 kg