Same price ≈ $3,700
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 600 nits
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.99 kg
- Thickness 16 mm vs 20 mm
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
Alternatives to MSI Stealth 16 AI+ RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Stealth 16 AI+ RTX 5070 Ti (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ $3,900
9.4
Alternatives to the Stealth 16 AI+ RTX 5070 Ti (2026)
12% pricier ≈ $4,300
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 125 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 28.5 TFLOPS
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 600 nits
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- Weight 2.14 kg vs 1.99 kg
12% cheaper ≈ $3,400
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 600 nits
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.99 kg
- Thickness 16 mm vs 20 mm
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
22% pricier ≈ $4,700
- GPU power (TGP) 160 W vs 125 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 39 TFLOPS vs 28.5 TFLOPS
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 600 nits
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
20% pricier ≈ $4,600
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 90 Wh
- RAM (base) 64 GB vs 16 GB
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
44% pricier ≈ $5,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 28.5 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 125 W
- Video memory 24 GB vs 12 GB
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- Weight 2.14 kg vs 1.99 kg
6% pricier ≈ $4,100
- GPU compute (FP32) 32 TFLOPS vs 28.5 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,645 vs 19,330
- Video memory 16 GB vs 12 GB
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
39% pricier ≈ $5,300
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Weight 1.58 kg vs 1.99 kg
- RAM (base) 64 GB vs 16 GB
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.99 kg
- Thickness 16.4 mm vs 20 mm
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,410 vs 19,330
- Video memory 32 GB vs 12 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 39.1 TFLOPS vs 28.5 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 10,496 vs 5,888