≈ $4,300
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 22,607 vs 14,502
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- Weight 2.14 kg vs 1.99 kg
Alternatives to MSI Stealth 16 AI+ RTX 5070 (2026)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Stealth 16 AI+ RTX 5070 (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Stealth 16 AI+ RTX 5070 (2026)
≈ $5,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 115 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,695 vs 14,502
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- Weight 2.14 kg vs 1.99 kg
≈ $3,700
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 600 nits
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 18,998 vs 14,502
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.99 kg
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
≈ $3,400
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 600 nits
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.99 kg
- Thickness 16 mm vs 20 mm
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
≈ $4,600
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 90 Wh
- RAM (base) 64 GB vs 16 GB
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Weight 1.85 kg vs 1.99 kg
- Thickness 16.4 mm vs 20 mm
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
≈ $4,700
- GPU power (TGP) 160 W vs 115 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 23,208 vs 14,502
- GPU compute (FP32) 39 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 128 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Weight 1.87 kg vs 1.99 kg
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
≈ $5,300
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 18,732 vs 14,502
- Weight 1.58 kg vs 1.99 kg
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 240 Hz
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 128 GB
- Video memory 32 GB vs 12 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,356 vs 14,502
- GPU shader cores 10,496 vs 4,608