- Battery capacity 75 Wh vs 54 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 18 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,248 vs 7,294
- SSD (up to) 1,024 GB vs 4,096 GB
- MUX switch
Alternatives to MSI Stealth 15 RTX 4050 (2023)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Stealth 15 RTX 4050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Stealth 15 RTX 4050 (2023)
- Battery capacity 75 Wh vs 54 Wh
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 1,024 GB vs 4,096 GB
- MUX switch
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 54 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,965 vs 7,294
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- GPU power (TGP) 80 W vs 90 W
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Battery capacity 75 Wh vs 54 Wh
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 1,024 GB vs 4,096 GB
- MUX switch
- Battery capacity 75 Wh vs 54 Wh
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 1,024 GB vs 4,096 GB
- MUX switch
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,816 vs 7,294
- GPU compute (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- Video memory 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,380 vs 7,294
- GPU compute (FP32) 17 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
≈ $3,900
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 54 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 20 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,860 vs 7,294
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 54 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU power (TGP) 95 W vs 90 W
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 7.9 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 85 Wh vs 54 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 18 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 64 GB
- GPU shader cores 2,048 vs 2,560
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB