- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,607 vs 7,697
- GPU compute (FP32) 12.3 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- Video memory 8 GB vs 6 GB
Alternatives to MSI Stealth 14 AI Studio RTX 4050 (2024)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Stealth 14 AI Studio RTX 4050 (2024) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Stealth 14 AI Studio RTX 4050 (2024)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,068 vs 7,697
- GPU compute (FP32) 17 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
≈ $1,100
- SSD (up to) 8,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 72 Wh
- Video memory 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
≈ $1,200
- SSD (up to) 8,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,494 vs 7,697
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.7 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 90 W
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Battery capacity 95 Wh vs 72 Wh
- Weight 2.45 kg vs 1.7 kg
- Pixel density 189 ppi vs 216 ppi
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 90 W
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Weight 2.45 kg vs 1.7 kg
- Pixel density 189 ppi vs 216 ppi
≈ $2,250
- GPU compute (FP32) 20 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 125 W vs 90 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,880 vs 7,697
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 96 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
≈ $1,400
- SSD (up to) 8,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 72 Wh
- Weight 2.71 kg vs 1.7 kg
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,091 vs 7,697
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 90 W
- Weight 2.45 kg vs 1.7 kg
- Pixel density 189 ppi vs 216 ppi
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 10.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 23,692 vs 7,697
- GPU power (TGP) 175 W vs 90 W
- Weight 2.45 kg vs 1.7 kg
- Pixel density 189 ppi vs 216 ppi