8% pricier ≈ $4,500
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,719 vs 24,199
- Response time 0.2 ms vs 3 ms
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 92 Wh
Alternatives to MSI Raider 16 HX B2W RTX 5080 (2026)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Raider 16 HX B2W RTX 5080 (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
approx. price≈ $4,200
9.3
Alternatives to the Raider 16 HX B2W RTX 5080 (2026)
17% pricier ≈ $4,900
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS
- Weight 2.6 kg vs 2.45 kg
- Thickness 29 mm vs 26 mm
10% cheaper ≈ $3,800
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Response time 0.2 ms vs 3 ms
- G-Sync / FreeSync
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- Battery capacity 83 Wh vs 92 Wh
9% cheaper ≈ $3,800
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
6% cheaper ≈ $3,900
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 92 Wh
- Ethernet 1 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s
- Max. supported RAM 64 GB vs 128 GB
14% pricier ≈ $4,800
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- CPU cores 16 vs 24
Same price ≈ $4,100
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 29,638 vs 24,199
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 92 Wh
- Weight 2.7 kg vs 2.45 kg
8% cheaper ≈ $3,900
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 92 Wh
- Ethernet 1 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s
- Max. supported RAM 64 GB vs 128 GB
5% cheaper ≈ $4,000
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 92 Wh
- Weight 2.7 kg vs 2.45 kg
- Brightness 400 nits vs 500 nits
Same price ≈ $4,100
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- CPU cores 16 vs 24
- Weight 2.72 kg vs 2.45 kg