≈ $1,450
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 4,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Response time 7 ms vs 28 ms
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.7 kg
- HDMI 2.1
- pan.tf
- Gaming laptops
- MSI Pulse 17 RTX 4050 (2023)
- Alternatives
Alternatives to MSI Pulse 17 RTX 4050 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Pulse 17 RTX 4050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Pulse 17 RTX 4050 (2023)
≈ $4,200
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,241 vs 8,645
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,878 vs 12,873
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 2.7 kg
≈ $1,600
- SSD (up to) 8,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 64 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 10,408 vs 12,873
- CPU cores 8 vs 10
≈ $1,750
- SSD (up to) 6,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Response time 7 ms vs 28 ms
- RAM (up to) 48 GB vs 64 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,129 vs 8,645
≈ $1,750
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,292 vs 8,645
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
≈ $6,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 33.9 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,090 vs 8,645
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,560
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 754 vs 861
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,149 vs 8,645
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 2,048 GB
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 2.7 kg
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
≈ $3,700
- Video memory 32 GB vs 6 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,065 vs 8,645
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 2,048 GB
≈ $3,000
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 2,560
- CPU cores 24 vs 10
- Video memory 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Thickness 30 mm vs 27.2 mm
- RAM speed 4,800 MHz vs 5,200 MHz
≈ $1,150
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,237 vs 8,645
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 13.4 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,835 vs 12,873
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.7 kg