- GPU compute (FP32) 8.2 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 58 Wh vs 51 Wh
- Video memory 4 GB vs 6 GB
- Response time 16 ms vs 3 ms
Alternatives to MSI GF75 Thin GTX 1660 Ti (2021)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the GF75 Thin GTX 1660 Ti (2021) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the GF75 Thin GTX 1660 Ti (2021)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 58 Wh vs 51 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 6.7 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- Video memory 4 GB vs 6 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,252 vs 5,870
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.4 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,536
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,261 vs 5,870
- Response time 16 ms vs 3 ms
- sRGB coverage 55% vs 100%
- GPU compute (FP32) 12 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,536
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,746 vs 5,870
- Response time 16 ms vs 3 ms
- sRGB coverage 55% vs 100%
- GPU compute (FP32) 12.6 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,536
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 7,317 vs 4,911
- Battery capacity 49 Wh vs 51 Wh
- Response time 29 ms vs 3 ms
- GPU compute (FP32) 8.2 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 7,317 vs 4,911
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 501 vs 283
- Battery capacity 49 Wh vs 51 Wh
- Video memory 4 GB vs 6 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.4 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 5,120 vs 1,536
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,179 vs 5,870
- Response time 11 ms vs 3 ms
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 12 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 3,840 vs 1,536
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Response time 11 ms vs 3 ms
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 57 Wh vs 51 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 3,258 vs 5,870
- GPU compute (FP32) 3.2 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 1,024 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 6.7 TFLOPS vs 4.9 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 4,716 vs 5,870
- Video memory 4 GB vs 6 GB