Same price ≈ $950
- GPU power (TGP) 75 W vs 40 W
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 54 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 10.5 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 144 Hz
- MUX switch
Alternatives to MSI Cyborg 15 A13 RTX 4050 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Cyborg 15 A13 RTX 4050 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Cyborg 15 A13 RTX 4050 (2023)
29% pricier ≈ $1,200
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 54 Wh
- SD card reader
- Weight 2.29 kg vs 1.98 kg
- Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6
5% pricier ≈ $970
- GPU power (TGP) 75 W vs 40 W
- M.2 SSD slots 2 vs 1
- Cooling fans 2 vs 1
- Weight 2.6 kg vs 1.98 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 6.7 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
28% pricier ≈ $1,200
- GPU power (TGP) 75 W vs 40 W
- SSD (up to) 5,000 GB vs 512 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 10.5 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- MUX switch
- Response time 20 ms vs 18 ms
11% cheaper ≈ $820
- Response time 3 ms vs 18 ms
- Weight 1.86 kg vs 1.98 kg
- SD card reader
- Battery capacity 52 Wh vs 54 Wh
- Video memory 4 GB vs 6 GB
29% pricier ≈ $1,200
- GPU power (TGP) 75 W vs 40 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 10.5 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,364 vs 6,316
- Weight 2.3 kg vs 1.98 kg
- Thickness 26 mm vs 23 mm
41% pricier ≈ $1,300
- GPU power (TGP) 65 W vs 40 W
- Video memory 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- MUX switch
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 4,646 vs 6,316
40% pricier ≈ $1,300
- GPU power (TGP) 45 W vs 40 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,336 vs 6,316
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.8 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
29% pricier ≈ $1,200
- GPU power (TGP) 95 W vs 40 W
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 54 Wh
- Advanced Optimus
- Weight 2.38 kg vs 1.98 kg
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,313 vs 6,316
35% pricier ≈ $1,250
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 40 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,783 vs 6,316
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.8 TFLOPS vs 8.2 TFLOPS
- Weight 2.25 kg vs 1.98 kg
- Response time 33 ms vs 18 ms