≈ $4,200
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- MUX switch
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,878 vs 11,204
Alternatives to MSI Crosshair 17 RTX 4070 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Crosshair 17 RTX 4070 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Crosshair 17 RTX 4070 (2023)
≈ $1,600
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 64 GB
- MUX switch
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,820 vs 13,716
- GPU compute (FP32) 16 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS
≈ $3,000
- CPU cores 24 vs 10
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Thickness 30 mm vs 27.2 mm
- SSD (up to) 4,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
≈ $6,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 33.9 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 150 W vs 105 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 754 vs 772
≈ $3,700
- Video memory 32 GB vs 8 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 145 W vs 105 W
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 18,694 vs 11,204
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- MUX switch
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 2.66 kg
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 18.2 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,417 vs 13,716
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.66 kg
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,756 vs 13,716
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.66 kg
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,934 vs 13,716