≈ $4,200
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 9,878 vs 11,204
Alternatives to MSI Crosshair 17 RTX 4060 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Crosshair 17 RTX 4060 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Crosshair 17 RTX 4060 (2023)
≈ $1,600
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- RAM (up to) 96 GB vs 64 GB
- MUX switch
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 10,408 vs 11,204
- CPU cores 8 vs 10
≈ $1,450
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,911 vs 10,957
- Weight 3 kg vs 2.66 kg
≈ $1,750
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- MUX switch
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
≈ $3,000
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 3,072
- CPU cores 24 vs 10
- Video memory 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Thickness 30 mm vs 27.2 mm
- SSD (up to) 4,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
≈ $6,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 33.9 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,090 vs 10,957
- GPU power (TGP) 150 W vs 105 W
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Cinebench 2024 multi-core 754 vs 772
≈ $1,750
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,129 vs 10,957
- RAM (up to) 48 GB vs 64 GB
≈ $3,700
- Video memory 32 GB vs 6 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 145 W vs 105 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 18,694 vs 11,204
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 105 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS
- Weight 2.8 kg vs 2.66 kg
- RAM (base) 8 GB vs 16 GB
- MUX switch
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 5,468 vs 10,957
- GPU compute (FP32) 7.9 TFLOPS vs 13.8 TFLOPS