- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,916 vs 11,804
- Screen size 16″ vs 17″
Alternatives to MSI Crosshair 17 HX RTX 4060 (2024)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Crosshair 17 HX RTX 4060 (2024) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Crosshair 17 HX RTX 4060 (2024)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Screen size 16″ vs 17″
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 7,424 vs 3,072
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,091 vs 11,804
- Screen size 16″ vs 17″
- GPU compute (FP32) 45.2 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 23,692 vs 11,804
- GPU shader cores 9,728 vs 3,072
- Screen size 16″ vs 17″
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 90 Wh
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 13,110 vs 17,213
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 90 Wh
- Thickness 21.8 mm vs 29.7 mm
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 13,110 vs 17,213
- SSD (up to) 8,192 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 12,732 vs 17,213
≈ $4,900
- GPU compute (FP32) 51.4 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 29,079 vs 11,804
- Video memory 24 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Panel type Mini-LED vs IPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Max. supported RAM 64 GB vs 96 GB
- Panel type Mini-LED vs IPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.6 kg vs 2.8 kg
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 96 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 15.1 TFLOPS vs 16 TFLOPS