Same price ≈ $1,300
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Battery capacity 55 Wh vs 53 Wh
- Thickness 23 mm vs 35 mm
Alternatives to Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 RTX 5050 (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Erazer Scout 17 E1 RTX 5050 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Erazer Scout 17 E1 RTX 5050 (2025)
Same price ≈ $1,300
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 53 Wh
- Thickness 23 mm vs 35 mm
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 2,560
- Screen size 15.6″ vs 17.3″
6% pricier ≈ $1,400
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Battery capacity 55 Wh vs 53 Wh
- Thickness 23 mm vs 35 mm
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
- SSD (base) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
Same price ≈ $1,350
- Battery capacity 70 Wh vs 53 Wh
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- SSD (base) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Screen size 16″ vs 17.3″
5% pricier ≈ $1,400
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 53 Wh
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Thickness 25 mm vs 35 mm
- SSD (base) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
7% cheaper ≈ $1,250
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 53 Wh
- Thickness 23 mm vs 35 mm
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
- SSD (base) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
6% pricier ≈ $1,400
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 53 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Thickness 24 mm vs 35 mm
Same price ≈ $1,350
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 53 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
- SSD (base) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
6% cheaper ≈ $1,250
- Battery capacity 75 Wh vs 53 Wh
- Thickness 26 mm vs 35 mm
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 2,560
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
- SSD (base) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
6% pricier ≈ $1,400
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 53 Wh
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 2,560
- Screen size 16″ vs 17.3″