≈ $6,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.9 TFLOPS vs 16.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,718 vs 12,390
- Video memory 24 GB vs 8 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- MUX switch
Alternatives to Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 10 RTX 5060 (2025)
10 thin gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Yoga Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 10 RTX 5060 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Yoga Pro 9i Aura Edition 16 10 RTX 5060 (2025)
≈ $4,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 31 TFLOPS vs 16.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,359 vs 12,390
- GPU shader cores 7,680 vs 3,328
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
≈ $2,450
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.8 TFLOPS vs 16.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 19,783 vs 12,390
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs 3K (1800p/2000p)
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 84 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 100 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,978 vs 12,390
- MUX switch
- CPU cores 10 vs 16
≈ $4,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 25.9 TFLOPS vs 16.6 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 18,437 vs 12,390
- GPU power (TGP) 110 W vs 100 W
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
≈ $3,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 24.2 TFLOPS vs 16.6 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 84 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 105 W vs 100 W
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 64 GB
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 23.2 TFLOPS vs 16.6 TFLOPS
- Weight 1.57 kg vs 1.93 kg
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,615 vs 12,390
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 73 Wh vs 84 Wh
≈ $5,300
- GPU compute (FP32) 30 TFLOPS vs 16.6 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 7,680 vs 3,328
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 18,732 vs 12,390
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 73 Wh vs 84 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 29 TFLOPS vs 16.6 TFLOPS
- GPU shader cores 7,680 vs 3,328
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 19,682 vs 12,390
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Battery capacity 73 Wh vs 84 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 100 W
- Weight 1.63 kg vs 1.93 kg
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 16.6 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 72 Wh vs 84 Wh
- CPU cores 10 vs 16