Same price ≈ $4,500
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 83 Wh
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,268 vs 26,719
- Response time 1 ms vs 0.2 ms
Alternatives to HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Omen Max 16 RTX 5080 (2026)
6% pricier ≈ $4,800
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Response time 1 ms vs 0.2 ms
- G-Sync / FreeSync
15% cheaper ≈ $3,800
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 21,127 vs 17,190
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 24,199 vs 26,719
18% pricier ≈ $5,300
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 500 nits
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Video memory 12 GB vs 16 GB
- GPU shader cores 5,888 vs 7,680
6% pricier ≈ $4,800
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Response time 1 ms vs 0.2 ms
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 25,007 vs 26,719
17% cheaper ≈ $3,800
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,794 vs 26,719
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.4 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS
Same price ≈ $4,400
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Battery capacity 92 Wh vs 83 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 175 W
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 10,575 vs 17,190
Same price ≈ $4,600
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Brightness 1,000 nits vs 500 nits
- Weight 2.65 kg vs 2.97 kg
- Thickness 28 mm vs 26 mm
- Bluetooth 5 vs 5.4
5% cheaper ≈ $4,300
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- Response time 1 ms vs 0.2 ms
- Ethernet 1 Gbit/s vs 5 Gbit/s
16% cheaper ≈ $3,800
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,096 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 83 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 42 TFLOPS