Same price ≈ $2,600
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Response time 1 ms vs 3 ms
- Weight 2.52 kg vs 2.68 kg
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 83 Wh
Alternatives to HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Omen Max 16 RTX 5070 Ti (2025)
12% pricier ≈ $2,900
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Response time 1 ms vs 3 ms
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 37.4 TFLOPS
8% cheaper ≈ $2,350
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 5,888
- Video memory 8 GB vs 12 GB
14% pricier ≈ $2,900
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 26,849 vs 21,096
- GPU compute (FP32) 42 TFLOPS vs 37.4 TFLOPS
- SSD (base) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
Same price ≈ $2,600
- Battery capacity 96 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Weight 2.61 kg vs 2.68 kg
- Advanced Optimus
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 37.4 TFLOPS
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 175 W
11% pricier ≈ $2,900
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Video memory 8 GB vs 12 GB
- GPU shader cores 4,608 vs 5,888
6% cheaper ≈ $2,450
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Weight 2.5 kg vs 2.68 kg
- Dolby Atmos
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 16,286 vs 21,096
5% cheaper ≈ $2,450
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- SSD (up to) 4,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 83 Wh
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 5,888
- Video memory 8 GB vs 12 GB
25% pricier ≈ $3,200
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Battery capacity 96 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Weight 2.61 kg vs 2.68 kg
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 175 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 37.4 TFLOPS
30% pricier ≈ $3,400
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Response time 1 ms vs 3 ms
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 175 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 37.4 TFLOPS