Same price ≈ $2,150
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.3 TFLOPS vs 9.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 15,035 vs 9,516
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- Brightness 400 nits vs 500 nits
Alternatives to HP Omen Max 16 RTX 5060 (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Omen Max 16 RTX 5060 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Omen Max 16 RTX 5060 (2025)
Same price ≈ $2,100
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 83 Wh
- SD card reader
- USB-A ports 3 vs 2
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 8,911 vs 9,516
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 18,758 vs 19,492
Same price ≈ $2,150
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 83 Wh
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Weight 2.4 kg vs 2.68 kg
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- Thunderbolt or USB4
10% cheaper ≈ $1,900
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.6 TFLOPS vs 9.7 TFLOPS
- Video memory 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,095 vs 9,516
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- Thickness 30 mm vs 23 mm
4% cheaper ≈ $2,050
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 9.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,047 vs 9,516
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 2.68 kg
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
15% pricier ≈ $2,450
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.3 TFLOPS vs 9.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 16,286 vs 9,516
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- Thickness 30 mm vs 23 mm
5% cheaper ≈ $2,050
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 9.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,277 vs 9,516
- GPU shader cores 5,888 vs 3,328
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 20
11% pricier ≈ $2,350
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Resolution class 3K (1800p/2000p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Panel type IPS vs OLED
- RAM (base) 16 GB vs 32 GB
23% pricier ≈ $2,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 31.2 TFLOPS vs 9.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 20,623 vs 9,516
- GPU shader cores 5,888 vs 3,328
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Max. supported RAM 32 GB vs 64 GB
24% pricier ≈ $2,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 9.7 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 14,574 vs 9,516
- Response time 1 ms vs 3 ms
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 83 Wh
- CPU cores 16 vs 20