5% cheaper ≈ $1,450
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.7 TFLOPS vs 4.5 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,783 vs 5,046
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Response time 36 ms vs 7 ms
- pan.tf
- Gaming laptops
- HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)
- Alternatives
Alternatives to HP Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Omen 17 RTX 5050 (2025)
5% cheaper ≈ $1,450
- GPU compute (FP32) 14 TFLOPS vs 4.5 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,490 vs 5,046
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Refresh rate 120 Hz vs 144 Hz
- IR camera (face login)
8% cheaper ≈ $1,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 14.9 TFLOPS vs 4.5 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 9,895 vs 5,046
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- MUX switch
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
Same price ≈ $1,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 4.5 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 15,862 vs 5,046
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 83 Wh
- IR camera (face login)
9% cheaper ≈ $1,400
- GPU compute (FP32) 15.9 TFLOPS vs 4.5 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 11,893 vs 5,046
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 83 Wh
- CPU cores 6 vs 8
Same price ≈ $1,550
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 4.5 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 12,792 vs 5,046
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Advanced Optimus
- IR camera (face login)
5% pricier ≈ $1,600
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.9 TFLOPS vs 4.5 TFLOPS
- Weight 1.6 kg vs 2.95 kg
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 7,733 vs 5,046
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Cooling fans 1 vs 2
12% cheaper ≈ $1,350
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.6 TFLOPS vs 4.5 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,314 vs 5,046
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 83 Wh
- IR camera (face login)
Same price ≈ $1,500
- GPU compute (FP32) 16.6 TFLOPS vs 4.5 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,129 vs 5,046
- CPU cores 16 vs 8
- Refresh rate 60 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Battery capacity 60 Wh vs 83 Wh
12% cheaper ≈ $1,350
- GPU compute (FP32) 13.4 TFLOPS vs 4.5 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 10,081 vs 5,046
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 512 GB vs 1,000 GB
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 83 Wh