≈ $4,200
- SSD (up to) 16,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity 99 Wh vs 83 Wh
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,241 vs 25,774
- pan.tf
- Gaming laptops
- HP Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023)
- Alternatives
Alternatives to HP Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Omen 17 RTX 4090 (2023)
≈ $5,000
- Brightness 1,100 nits vs 300 nits
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Advanced Optimus
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 21,012 vs 25,774
- Geekbench 6 multi-core 11,921 vs 14,604
≈ $2,000
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 144 Hz
- GPU compute (FP32) 21.8 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 13,260 vs 25,774
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- GPU compute (FP32) 25.4 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 15,114 vs 25,774
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- GPU compute (FP32) 24.7 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
- SSD (up to) 2,048 GB vs 4,096 GB
≈ $6,800
- RAM (up to) 64 GB vs 32 GB
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 150 W vs 175 W
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Screen size 16″ vs 17.3″
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Battery capacity 100 Wh vs 83 Wh
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS
≈ $4,200
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 83 Wh
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 4,096 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 37.6 TFLOPS vs 45.2 TFLOPS