Same price ≈ $1,500
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
- MUX switch
- pan.tf
- Gaming laptops
- HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)
- Alternatives
Alternatives to HP Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Omen 16 RTX 5070 (2025)
7% cheaper ≈ $1,400
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 2.43 kg
- Max. supported RAM 64 GB vs 32 GB
- USB-C ports 2 vs 1
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
Same price ≈ $1,450
- RAM (up to) 128 GB vs 32 GB
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 70 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 95 W vs 115 W
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
24% pricier ≈ $1,850
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
- CPU cores 14 vs 16
7% cheaper ≈ $1,400
- SSD (up to) 2,000 GB vs 1,000 GB
- 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 15,862 vs 13,913
- Max. supported RAM 96 GB vs 32 GB
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
15% pricier ≈ $1,750
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 2.43 kg
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
22% pricier ≈ $1,850
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- Battery capacity 80 Wh vs 70 Wh
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 18.4 TFLOPS vs 26.2 TFLOPS
27% pricier ≈ $1,900
- Video memory 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 70 Wh
- GPU power (TGP) 140 W vs 115 W
- Resolution class Full HD (1080p/1200p) vs QHD (1440p/1600p)
- Refresh rate 165 Hz vs 240 Hz
7% cheaper ≈ $1,400
- Battery capacity 76 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Weight 2.2 kg vs 2.43 kg
- Max. supported RAM 64 GB vs 32 GB
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- GPU power (TGP) 85 W vs 115 W
10% cheaper ≈ $1,350
- Weight 1.58 kg vs 2.43 kg
- Brightness 500 nits vs 300 nits
- Thickness 21 mm vs 25 mm
- RAM (up to) 16 GB vs 32 GB
- GPU shader cores 3,328 vs 4,608