Same price ≈ $1,750
- Refresh rate 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- Weight 2.52 kg vs 2.43 kg
- Advanced Optimus
- pan.tf
- Gaming laptops
- HP Omen 16 RTX 5050 (2025)
- Alternatives
Alternatives to HP Omen 16 RTX 5050 (2025)
10 gaming laptops at a similar price that compete with the Omen 16 RTX 5050 (2025) — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the Omen 16 RTX 5050 (2025)
4% pricier ≈ $1,800
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Video memory 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Weight 2.65 kg vs 2.43 kg
- Thickness 31 mm vs 25 mm
6% pricier ≈ $1,850
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 100 W
- Advanced Optimus
- Thickness 27 mm vs 25 mm
Same price ≈ $1,700
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Panel type OLED vs IPS
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
- MUX switch
Same price ≈ $1,750
- RAM (up to) 32 GB vs 16 GB
- GPU compute (FP32) 26.2 TFLOPS vs 13.6 TFLOPS
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 70 Wh
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
- Response time 11 ms vs 3 ms
Same price ≈ $1,750
- Weight 1.6 kg vs 2.43 kg
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- CPU cores 6 vs 16
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.7 TFLOPS vs 13.6 TFLOPS
15% cheaper ≈ $1,450
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- SSD (up to) 1,000 GB vs 512 GB
- CPU cores 8 vs 16
- GPU power (TGP) 85 W vs 100 W
Same price ≈ $1,700
- Weight 1.8 kg vs 2.43 kg
- SD card reader
- Thickness 23 mm vs 25 mm
- CPU cores 6 vs 16
- Battery capacity 58 Wh vs 70 Wh
11% pricier ≈ $1,900
- Battery capacity 90 Wh vs 70 Wh
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU power (TGP) 115 W vs 100 W
- Advanced Optimus
- Thickness 27 mm vs 25 mm
7% cheaper ≈ $1,600
- Weight 1.6 kg vs 2.43 kg
- Resolution class QHD (1440p/1600p) vs Full HD (1080p/1200p)
- Thunderbolt or USB4
- GPU power (TGP) 60 W vs 100 W
- GPU compute (FP32) 9.9 TFLOPS vs 13.6 TFLOPS